Connect with us

politics

Senate splits over passage of 2019 elections order bill

Published

on

 

Senate election

In what order should the 2019 elections be conducted?

This was the bone of contention among senators at plenary yesterday during debate on the report of the conference committee which harmonised the grey areas to the amendments to the Electoral Act.

The House of Representatives passed the bill without hitch.

Some members of both chambers of the National Assembly constituted the committee.

Section 25(i) of the amendment bill, which places the National Assembly poll first in the sequence of elections sparked the row.

The bill was passed and concurred with by both chambers of the National Assembly before it went for harmonisation.

It is in the process of being sent to President Muhammadu Buhari for assent.

Under the bill, the governorship and Houses of Assembly elections come after the National Assembly poll. The presidential election comes last.

Senators, who kicked against the bill, said it was self-serving and targeted at the President Muhammadu Buhari’s re-election bid.

But those in support faulted them, saying it was not the first time in the nation’s history that National Assembly polls would be coming first in the order of elections.

They noted that in 1979 under military regime, the Senatorial election was held on July 7; presidential election, August 17,  adding that in 1992 the House of Representatives and Senatorial elections were held on July 7; presidential election, June 12, 1993.  In 1999, they said the Houses of Assembly, House of Representatives and Senatorial elections were held on February 20, and presidential election February 27.

At plenary, Senator Abdullahi Adamu’s argument against the bill was truncated by Senate President Bukola Saraki.

Adamu led nine other senators out of the chambers to address reporters. The group said the amendment was in bad faith.

Speaking one after the other, they picked holes in the bill, saying it was skewed against the President.

They said the amendment was hasty and uncalled for and must not be allowed to stand.

According to the senators, the bill sought to usurp the constitutional role of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on the fixing of election dates.

The senators also faulted the process leading to the amendment.

They claimed that only 36 of the 360-member House of Representatives passed the bill.

The number, they said, was not up to the quorum required to pass a bill in the National Assembly.

They alleged that the conference committee report of the Senate and House of Representatives on the bill was not signed by some members, including Senator Suleiman Nazif (Bauchi North), its chairman.

Nazif is also the Senate committee chairman on INEC.

The Adamu group expressed worry over the financial implications of running three staggered elections instead of two.

The present harsh economic situation in the country can hardly accommodate elections in three stages, the group claimed.

They argued for the retention of the 2015 order of elections, where the presidential and National Assembly polls were held simultaneously as the first in the sequence.

In a swift reaction, Nazif, at a separate briefing, told the protesting senators that politics is dynamic, adding that laws are reviewed in line with prevailing circumstances.

He dismissed the group’s claim that the bill was targeted at the President, saying it was unfair to make such insinuation.

According to him, the amendment went through due process in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, before it was referred to the conference committee for harmonisation.

Nazif said the committee, comprising members from both chambers scrutinised the bill and consulted wide before submitting its report.

Nazif debunked the group’s claim that he did not sign the report.

He displayed a copy of the bill where he and others signed the document.

The senator expressed surprise at what he described as his colleagues belated opposition to the bill, saying the amendment was “extensively debated” by the Senate before it was passed.

Buttressing the action of the committee, which approved the amendment, he quoted Order 87 (c) of the Senate rules which says:

”The conference committee shall deliberate only on areas of disagreement between the Senate and the House of Representatives. The conference committee shall not insert in its report any matter not committed to it by either the Senate or House of Representatives nor shall it be in order to strike out from the bill, matter agreed to by the Senate or House of Representatives.”

To them, there was nothing novel in what the National Assembly did.

Among the protesting senators are Abu Ibrahim (Katsina South); Ali Wakil (Bauchi South); Abdullahi Gumel (Jigawa North West); Ibrahim Kurfi (Katsina Central); Yahaya Abdullahi (Kebbi North); Binta Garba Masi (Adamawa North); Ovie Omo-Agege (Delta Central); Andrew Uchendu (Rivers East); and Benjamin Uwajimogu (Imo North).

The senators claimed to be 59 in all, saying others could not join them because they were attending to official matters at other locations.

Reporters’ request for their full list was not met by the senators by press time.

One of them, Senator Andrew Uchendu, noted that the amendment was in conflict with Section 132 of the Constitution which gave INEC the power to fix dates for elections.

The Rivers State lawmaker said the country had enormous problems to contend with and should be spared of additional problems.

Senator Omo-Agege, who called for division of the House at plenary, was overruled by Saraki.

He insisted that the amendment was contrary to constitutional provisions.

Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi said there was nothing personal about the amendment, adding that it was done in the country’s interest as well as to deepen democracy.

He said those opposed to the amendment were exercising their democratic right but insisted that the right thing should always be done.

The National Assembly, Abdullahi said, was working to strengthen the electoral process and  also to ensure the conduct of credible elections in the country.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

politics

Update : C’River PDP Deputy Governorship Candidate,Emana Resigns From Party

Published

on

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Deputy Governorship Candidate in 2023 general election, in Cross River State, Dr Emana Duke Ambroose-Amawhe, has resigned her membership from the party.

In a letter dated
march 28,2025, and addressed to the chairman of Edem Odo Ward, in Akpabuyo local government area of Cross River State, the former Deputy Governorship Candidate,explained that the resignation was with immediate effect.

She said her decision to leave the party was not made lightly, but she remains committed to serving her community and contributing to the progress of Cross River state and nation in other capacities.

In her words, “i am writing to formally resign my membership from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) with immediate effect.

” I sincerely appreciate the opportunity given to me over time to contribute my quota to the growth of the party and the chance to serve as the Deputy Governorship Candidate in the last general elections.

” It was a privilege to be part of the PDP’s vision and engage with our people in meaningful ways. However, after much reflection in light of the current state of affairs within the party, I believe it is time for me to move on.

“This decision was not made lightly, but I remain committed to serving my community and contributing to the progress of our state and nation in other capacities.

Continuing ” I appreciate the relationships and experiences gained during my time with the party and wish the PDP success in its future endeavours.

Amawhe, an embodiment of competence, capability and capacity,
was the Deputy Governorship Candidate to Senator Sandy Onor in Cross River State during the 2023 elections.

She was also an aspirant to the House of Representatives for the Bakassi/Akpabuyo/Calabar South Federal Constituency on the platform of the PDP.

Continue Reading

politics

Breaking : Sule Lamido blasts El-Rufai over call to join SDP, Says how can a grandson claim his grandfather knows nothing’

Published

on

Former Governor of Jigawa State and chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Sule Lamido, has fired back at former Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir El-Rufai, over his call for opposition politicians to join the Social Democratic Party (SDP).

El-Rufai, who recently announced his defection from the All Progressives Congress (APC) to SDP, urged opposition leaders including Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rotimi Amaechi, and Rauf Aregbesola to join him in his new political movement.

However, Lamido in an interview with BBC dismissed El-Rufai’s invitation, questioning his political ideology and commitment to national development.

“With all due respect, how does he expect us in PDP to leave and join another party? The PDP that we built is the same party that made him who he is today. How can a grandson claim his grandfather knows nothing?” Lamido said.

He recalled that El-Rufai once declared there were no political elders in Nigeria, insisting that he and his allies were the true power brokers.

“But now he claims he advised Buhari. If he truly had the power he once boasted of, why did he have to seek Buhari’s counsel?” Lamido asked.

The former governor stressed that, despite PDP’s internal challenges, it remained his political home.

“If PDP is struggling today, it is still the party that nurtured El-Rufai. If he claims PDP is dead, then he must remember that it is the party that gave him his political foundation. Whatever he has achieved today, PDP made it possible.”

“If I didn’t join APC in 2014 when I was invited, and they left PDP out of anger, why are they now leaving APC? What has APC done to them?” he asked.

He maintained that governance should not be driven by emotions or personal grudges.

“Leadership is about patience, foresight, and working for the peace of the people and the nation. If you allow emotions to dictate your decisions, you will never lead objectively.”

He stressed that if the goal is to unseat President Bola Tinubu, it should not be based on personal grievances but on national interest.

“We should not fight Tinubu just because we are angry at him or seeking revenge. Leadership should be about prioritizing the country’s well-being rather than personal emotions.”

Lamido concluded by urging politicians to focus on strengthening the country rather than making decisions based on resentment.

Continue Reading

politics

Breaking : Rivers State House of Assembly Gives Governor Fubara, 48 hours to present 2025 Budget

Published

on

….I’ll obey Supreme Court judgment, says Fubara

Forty-eight hours after the Supreme Court handed down two judgments that threaten the soul of the Siminalayi Fubara Rivers State government, the governor yesterday announced his intention to fully obey the orders.

In a twist, described by observers of the Rivers State politics as unexpected, Fubara told Rivers residents that he expected to get the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment by Friday to enable him to take the necessary action.

He ordered the 23 local government chairmen, whose election was voided by the judgment, to quit today after handing over to heads of personnel.

The apex court on Friday gave two judgments – one by Justice Akomaye Agim, which recognises the Martins Amaewhule-led 26 members of the state House of Assembly, and the second by Justice Jamilu Tukur, which declared as invalid the election conducted on October 5, 2024, that led to the emergence of 23 chairmen and 319 councillors.

The apex court further invalidated the state budget and ordered the Central Bank and the Accountant-General of the Federation to stop releasing funds to the state government pending when Fubara would re-present the budget to the authentic House of Assembly led by Speaker Amaewhule.

In a broadcast yesterday, Governor Fubara said: “I have had a meeting with my team of lawyers and they have assured me that the certified true copy of the judgments may be available to them by Friday 7th March 2025.

“I assure you that upon the receipt of certified judgments, we shall study their ramifications and implement them without reservations to move the state forward.

“Furthermore, given the outlawing of caretaker arrangements in the local government system, I hereby direct the heads of personnel management to immediately take over the administration of the 23 local government councils pending the conduct of fresh elections by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission.

“I further direct the outgoing local government chairmen to formally hand over the levers of power to the heads of personnel management by Monday, 3rd March 2025.”

Fubara said since its inception, his administration conducted the affairs of government within the framework of the constitution, due process and the rule of law.

The governor noted with regret the trying times the state had been plunged but urged everyone to remain calm and peacefully go about their legitimate daily activities and be sure that his administration would continue to do everything in meeting their aspirations.

Fubara said: “We are all aware of the recent Supreme Court judgments and pronouncements regarding aspects of the lingering political disputes in our dear state.

“Although we disagree with the judgments, we are bound to obey the orders made therein as a law-abiding government.

“Since inception, we have conducted the affairs of government within the framework of our Constitution, due process and the rule of law.

“While we are not above mistakes because we are humans, we believe that we have not, as a government, done anything deliberately to trample on the rule of law or the hallowed principles of constitutional governance.”

Fubara, Amaewhule should work together, say elders

The Rivers State Elders Council (RSEC) called on Fubara and Speaker Amaewhule, to prioritise the interest of the state and work together in line with the Supreme Court judgment.

Referring to Fubara and the lawmakers as one political family, the elders in a statement signed by its Chairman, Chief Ferdinand Alabraba, said there was no more case standing between the both parties.

The elders congratulated the people of Rivers State on what they described as the well-rounded pronouncements of the Supreme Court oon the political crises.

The statement said: “The Elders Council further commends the people of the state for their resilience, patience and peaceful disposition throughout the period of the crises in the state while awaiting the final verdict of the apex court of the land on all the matters.

“Now that the Supreme Court has spoken unequivocally on all the matters, we believe strongly that nothing now stands in the way of His Excellency, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, Governor of Rivers State and Rt Hon Martin Amaewhule, Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, working together in the best interest of the state and her people.

“We are, therefore, calling on the Governor of Rivers State and the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, who both emerged from the same political family in the state, to put Rivers State above all other considerations, personal or otherwise, and ensure urgently that all necessary steps are taken in conformity with their constitutional responsibilities.

“We give God Almighty all the glory for granting Rivers State this unique opening for peace to return to our dear state.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Newsthumb Magazine | All rights reserved